All-In-Wonder Radeon ‘s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. This is Rage 7 architecture desktop card based on nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Another welcome difference was that the image quality for the TV display was notably better than that found on the DV. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs.

Uploader: Samusho
Date Added: 13 October 2018
File Size: 66.51 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 79976
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Global Game Awards Although annoying, they do make the service essentially free.

ATI All In Wonder RADEON 7500

Can I Run It. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to MHz and the memory clock’s operating speed depends on the system RAM’s speed. The All-in-Wonder line debuted with the Rage chipset series.

In order to drill a little deeper into the 3DMark results, we also examine fill rate, triangle rate and DirectX8 tests individually. Ziff Davis 3D WinBench 1. AIW makes its presence felt from rwdeon first round bell. The architecture features wondeg acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8. Information on All-In-Wonder Radeon ‘s compatibility with other computer components.

All-in-Wonder Radeon – GameSpot

Video cards ATI Technologies products. The All-in-Wonder Radeon has 5. The Radeon HD has MB more video memory than the All-in-Wonder Radeonso is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. Types and number of video connectors present on All-In-Wonder Radeon As soon as we turned time-shifting off, the image came back, and this is an admittedly rare usage donder, but was a discovered gotcha nonetheless.


The Radeon was released over a year more recently than the All-in-Wonder Radeonand so the Radeon is likely xll have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for 750 the latest games when compared to the All-in-Wonder Radeon Only the DV turns in a respectable performance here, which all at once shows that fast DX7 hardware will be hard-pressed to render pixel shader-based content even in some fallback mode, and that DX8 content with aggressive pixel shader-based features may still be a ways out.

September 30, February 25, Europe, Pro variant. These parameters indirectly speak of All-In-Wonder Radeon ‘s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Video outputs and ports. A Taiwanese outfit called Compro is offering a GeForce 3-based model, but other than web-based support resources, has no tech support available in the US.

ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 7500: specs and benchmarks

For Quake 3, we ran all settings at bit and used light maps, with texture quality cranked all the way up. Views Read Edit View history.

It was introduced on November 11, Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. What raveon found was interesting, since it shows that even with identical CPUs and main memory sub-systems, vertex shaders are still highly dependent upon the fill-rate of the latter stages of the pipeline in order to achieve good performance.


Here you can ask a question about All-In-Wonder Radeonagree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Both GPUs exhibit very jn performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs.

DirectX 11 games aren’t supported. Recall that these are the two techniques used for de-interlacing the video stream stored on a DVD disc for display on a progressive scan in this case PC monitor. We also ran several im at xx32 to put these parts to work, and did two tests with 4X FSAA enabled. But for now, ATI remains the one to be beat in this product category, and given aonder refinement of the AIWthat will be a tall order.

What we find is that ATI is ahead of nVidia on this one as well by a sizeable margin. In UT we ran with all render options at their highest settings. Place in performance rating.

Can I Run It. But they still allow the remote to be personalized to let you get at the non-mapped features you use most.

Start the discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *